Skip to content

docs(config/node): add false for node option #1317

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2017

Conversation

simon04
Copy link
Collaborator

@simon04 simon04 commented Jun 20, 2017

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ These options configure whether to polyfill or mock certain [Node.js globals](ht
This is an object where each property is the name of a Node global or module and each value may be one of the following...

- `true`: Provide a polyfill.
- `"mock"`: Provide a mock that implements the expected interface but has little or no fuctionality.
- `"mock"`: Provide a mock that implements the expected interface but has little or no functionality.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, that misspelling didn't read too well 😆

@skipjack skipjack merged commit c6f739e into webpack:master Jun 20, 2017
foolip added a commit to GoogleChromeLabs/confluence that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
Dependencies pulled in by `require('crypto')` account for several
hundred kb of vendors.bundle.js.

https://medium.com/walmartlabs/webpack-optimization-a-case-study-92b130334b6c
webpack/webpack.js.org#1317
foolip added a commit to GoogleChromeLabs/confluence that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
Dependencies pulled in by `require('crypto')` account for several
hundred kb of vendors.bundle.js.

https://medium.com/walmartlabs/webpack-optimization-a-case-study-92b130334b6c
webpack/webpack.js.org#1317
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants