Fix #9016: Fix stackoverflows in provablyDisjoint #9017
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Surely, two intersection types A1 & A2 and B1 & B2 are provable disjoint if any pair of A_i and B_j is provably disjoint? This is already handled by the single-side cases for AndTypes. The dropped case imposed a stronger condition.
|
@liufengyun Can you please check that the exhaustivity test changes are correct? |
liufengyun
approved these changes
May 21, 2020
OlivierBlanvillain
approved these changes
May 22, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.