Skip to content

Implement the notion of a "generated unsafe block" #9013

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This way syntax extensions can generate unsafe blocks without worrying about them generating unnecessary unsafe warnings. Perhaps a special keyword could be added to be used in macros, but I don't think that's the best solution.

Currently if you use format! and friends in an unsafe block you're guaranteed to get some unused-unsafe warnings which is unfortunate. We normally do want these warnings, but I'm ok ignoring them in the case of compiler-generated unsafe blocks. I tried to do this in the least intrusive way possible, but others may have better ideas about how to do this.

@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ pub struct Field {
#[deriving(Clone, Eq, Encodable, Decodable, IterBytes)]
pub enum BlockCheckMode {
DefaultBlock,
UnsafeBlock,
UnsafeBlock(/* generated internally */ bool),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth splitting this into a self-documenting enum? (enum UnsafeType { GeneratedUnsafe, UserUnsafe } or something.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a bad idea, updated with this change now.

@sanxiyn
Copy link
Member

sanxiyn commented Sep 10, 2013

Needs rebase.

This way syntax extensions can generate unsafe blocks without worrying about
them generating unnecessary unsafe warnings. Perhaps a special keyword could be
added to be used in macros, but I don't think that's the best solution.
@bors bors closed this Sep 11, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants