Skip to content

Make debug!, etc. macros not require a format string #5278

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Mar 8, 2013

r?

log can polymorphically log anything, but debug!, etc. requires a format string. With this patch you can equivalently write debug!(foo) or debug!("%?", foo).

I'm doing this because I was trying to remove log (replacing it with nothing, at least temporarily), but there are a number of logging statements that just want to print an arbitrary value and don't care about the format string.

I'm not entirely convinced this is a good change, since it overloads the implementation of these macros and makes their usage slightly more nuanced.

The one thing `log` can still do is polymorphically log anything,
but debug!, etc. require a format string. With this patch
you can equivalently write `debug!(foo)` or `debug!("%?", foo)`
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2013
r?

`log` can  polymorphically log anything, but debug!, etc. requires a format string. With this patch you can equivalently write `debug!(foo)` or `debug!("%?", foo)`.

I'm doing this because I was trying to remove `log` (replacing it with nothing, at least temporarily), but there are a number of logging statements that just want to print an arbitrary value and don't care about the format string.

I'm not entirely convinced this is a good change, since it overloads the implementation of these macros and makes their usage slightly more nuanced.
@bors bors closed this Mar 8, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants