Rollup of 4 pull requests

Cargo.lock

@@ -185,9 +185,6 @@ name = "anyhow"
 version = "1.0.95"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "34ac096ce696dc2fcabef30516bb13c0a68a11d30131d3df6f04711467681b04"
-dependencies = [
- "backtrace",
-]
 
 [[package]]
 name = "ar_archive_writer"

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/check.rs

@@ -1845,13 +1845,18 @@ pub(super) fn check_coroutine_obligations(
 
     debug!(?typeck_results.coroutine_stalled_predicates);
 
+    let mode = if tcx.next_trait_solver_globally() {
+        TypingMode::post_borrowck_analysis(tcx, def_id)
+    } else {
+        TypingMode::analysis_in_body(tcx, def_id)
+    };
+
     let infcx = tcx
         .infer_ctxt()
         // typeck writeback gives us predicates with their regions erased.
         // As borrowck already has checked lifetimes, we do not need to do it again.
         .ignoring_regions()
-        // FIXME(#132279): This should eventually use the already defined hidden types.
-        .build(TypingMode::analysis_in_body(tcx, def_id));
+        .build(mode);
 
     let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new_with_diagnostics(&infcx);
     for (predicate, cause) in &typeck_results.coroutine_stalled_predicates {
@@ -1864,12 +1869,14 @@ pub(super) fn check_coroutine_obligations(
         return Err(infcx.err_ctxt().report_fulfillment_errors(errors));
     }
 
-    // Check that any hidden types found when checking these stalled coroutine obligations
-    // are valid.
-    for (key, ty) in infcx.take_opaque_types() {
-        let hidden_type = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty.hidden_type);
-        let key = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(key);
-        sanity_check_found_hidden_type(tcx, key, hidden_type)?;
+    if !tcx.next_trait_solver_globally() {
+        // Check that any hidden types found when checking these stalled coroutine obligations
+        // are valid.
+        for (key, ty) in infcx.take_opaque_types() {
+            let hidden_type = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty.hidden_type);
+            let key = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(key);
+            sanity_check_found_hidden_type(tcx, key, hidden_type)?;
+        }
     }
 
     Ok(())

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill.rs

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ use rustc_infer::traits::{
     self, FromSolverError, MismatchedProjectionTypes, Obligation, ObligationCause,
     ObligationCauseCode, PredicateObligation, PredicateObligations, SelectionError, TraitEngine,
 };
-use rustc_middle::bug;
 use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
+use rustc_middle::{bug, span_bug};
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GenerateProofTree, HasChanged, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
 use tracing::{instrument, trace};
 
@@ -258,6 +258,23 @@ fn fulfillment_error_for_no_solution<'tcx>(
                 MismatchedProjectionTypes { err: TypeError::Mismatch },
             )
         }
+        ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstArgHasType(ct, expected_ty)) => {
+            let ct_ty = match ct.kind() {
+                ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(uv) => {
+                    infcx.tcx.type_of(uv.def).instantiate(infcx.tcx, uv.args)
+                }
+                ty::ConstKind::Param(param_ct) => param_ct.find_ty_from_env(obligation.param_env),
+                _ => span_bug!(
+                    obligation.cause.span,
+                    "ConstArgHasWrongType failed but we don't know how to compute type"
+                ),
+            };
+            FulfillmentErrorCode::Select(SelectionError::ConstArgHasWrongType {
+                ct,
+                ct_ty,
+                expected_ty,
+            })
+        }
         ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(..) => {
             FulfillmentErrorCode::Project(MismatchedProjectionTypes { err: TypeError::Mismatch })
         }

library/std/src/ffi/os_str.rs

@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ impl OsString {
         OsStr::from_inner_mut(self.inner.leak())
     }
 
-    /// Truncate the the `OsString` to the specified length.
+    /// Truncate the `OsString` to the specified length.
     ///
     /// # Panics
     /// Panics if `len` does not lie on a valid `OsStr` boundary

library/std/src/pipe.rs

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ impl PipeReader {
     /// let mut jobs = vec![];
     /// let (reader, mut writer) = std::pipe::pipe()?;
     ///
-    /// // Write NUM_SLOT characters the the pipe.
+    /// // Write NUM_SLOT characters the pipe.
     /// writer.write_all(&[b'|'; NUM_SLOT as usize])?;
     ///
     /// // Spawn several processes that read a character from the pipe, do some work, then

library/std/src/sync/poison/mutex.rs

@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> Mutex<T> {
     /// # Errors
     ///
     /// If another user of this mutex panicked while holding the mutex, then
-    /// this call will return an error containing the the underlying data
+    /// this call will return an error containing the underlying data
     /// instead.
     ///
     /// # Examples

src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/dist-riscv64-linux/patches/gcc/8.5.0/0002-hidden-jump-target.patch

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28509
 And this is the first version of the proposed binutils patch,
 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-November/118398.html
 
-After applying the binutils patch, I get the the unexpected error when
+After applying the binutils patch, I get the unexpected error when
 building libgcc,
 
 /scratch/nelsonc/riscv-gnu-toolchain/riscv-gcc/libgcc/config/riscv/div.S:42:

src/tools/opt-dist/Cargo.toml

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ edition = "2021"
 build_helper = { path = "../../build_helper" }
 env_logger = "0.11"
 log = "0.4"
-anyhow = { version = "1", features = ["backtrace"] }
+anyhow = "1"
 humantime = "2"
 humansize = "2"
 sysinfo = { version = "0.31.2", default-features = false, features = ["disk"] }

tests/ui/coroutine/issue-52304.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 //@ check-pass
+//@ revisions: current next
+//@ ignore-compare-mode-next-solver (explicit revisions)
 
 #![feature(coroutines, coroutine_trait)]
 

tests/ui/duplicate/multiple-types-with-same-name-and-derive.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // Here, there are two types with the same name. One of these has a `derive` annotation, but in the
-// expansion these `impl`s are associated to the the *other* type. There is a suggestion to remove
+// expansion these `impl`s are associated to the *other* type. There is a suggestion to remove
 // unneeded type parameters, but because we're now point at a type with no type parameters, the
 // suggestion would suggest removing code from an empty span, which would ICE in nightly.
 //

tests/ui/typeck/issue-114918/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.stderr → tests/ui/typeck/issue-114918/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.current.stderr

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 error[E0308]: mismatched types
-  --> $DIR/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs:15:39
+  --> $DIR/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs:20:39
    |
 LL |     fn func<const N: u32>() -> [(); { () }] {
    |                                       ^^ expected `usize`, found `()`
 
 error: the constant `N` is not of type `usize`
-  --> $DIR/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs:7:32
+  --> $DIR/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs:12:32
    |
 LL |     fn func<const N: u32>() -> [(); N];
    |                                ^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found `u32`

tests/ui/typeck/issue-114918/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.next.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+error[E0308]: mismatched types
+  --> $DIR/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs:20:39
+   |
+LL |     fn func<const N: u32>() -> [(); { () }] {
+   |                                       ^^ expected `usize`, found `()`
+
+error: the constant `N` is not of type `usize`
+  --> $DIR/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs:12:32
+   |
+LL |     fn func<const N: u32>() -> [(); N];
+   |                                ^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found `u32`
+
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.

tests/ui/typeck/issue-114918/const-in-impl-fn-return-type.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
+//@ revisions: current next
+//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+//@ ignore-compare-mode-next-solver (explicit revisions)
+
 // Regression test for #114918
+
 // Test that a const generic enclosed in a block within the return type
 // of an impl fn produces a type mismatch error instead of triggering
 // a const eval cycle