Skip to content

Add a glossary to the Rust Reference #18162

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
FreeFull opened this issue Oct 19, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Add a glossary to the Rust Reference #18162

FreeFull opened this issue Oct 19, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@FreeFull
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, it's pretty hard to find information about specific constructs such as type Foo = Bar; in the Reference unless one already knows in which section, and under which subsection it would be. A glossary of keywords, attributes and other relevant things at the end of the Reference would be massively helpful in finding the information.

@emberian
Copy link
Member

We have this information in the wiki as the Rusticon. It doesn't see many edits these days, maybe it should live in tree.

@FreeFull
Copy link
Contributor Author

I suppose what I was thinking about would be more of an index rather than a glossary, but having both be in the reference would probably be a good idea. It's not easy to find the Rusticon unless one knows it exists.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

I'm going to consider this as part of #16676 , thanks.

lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
…ykril

fix: Consider lifetime GATs object unsafe

Fixes rust-lang#18156.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants