-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Add a glossary to the Rust Reference #18162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
We have this information in the wiki as the Rusticon. It doesn't see many edits these days, maybe it should live in tree. |
I suppose what I was thinking about would be more of an index rather than a glossary, but having both be in the reference would probably be a good idea. It's not easy to find the Rusticon unless one knows it exists. |
I'm going to consider this as part of #16676 , thanks. |
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this issue
Sep 25, 2024
…ykril fix: Consider lifetime GATs object unsafe Fixes rust-lang#18156.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently, it's pretty hard to find information about specific constructs such as
type Foo = Bar;
in the Reference unless one already knows in which section, and under which subsection it would be. A glossary of keywords, attributes and other relevant things at the end of the Reference would be massively helpful in finding the information.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: