Skip to content

Consider -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables #13889

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
pcwalton opened this issue May 2, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Consider -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables #13889

pcwalton opened this issue May 2, 2014 · 3 comments
Labels
A-codegen Area: Code generation A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. I-slow Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to performance of generated code.

Comments

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

pcwalton commented May 2, 2014

Apparently it helps reduce the amount of exception code generated by quite a bit.

@gereeter
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any downside to this, or is this just yet to be done?

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

Should the be moved to rust-lang/rfcs?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

In clang this just translates to -munwind-tables which translates to UnwindTables which later turns into the UWTable LLVM attribute. We don't apply this by default to Rust functions, so I think this is basically done.

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2025
…is uncertain (rust-lang#13889)

fixes rust-lang#12670

Continuation of rust-lang#12688. r? @Jarcho if you don't mind?

changelog: [`manual_unwrap_or_default`] fix wrong suggestions when
condition type is uncertain
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-codegen Area: Code generation A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. I-slow Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to performance of generated code.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants