-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
DOC: Move API breaking to appropriate sections #34865
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unless i am missing something a fair amount was deleted here
@@ -623,57 +532,14 @@ The method :meth:`core.DataFrameGroupBy.size` would previously ignore ``as_index | |||
|
|||
df.groupby("a", as_index=False).size() | |||
|
|||
.. _whatsnew_110.api_breaking.apply_applymap_first_once: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
where did this one go?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -524,39 +466,6 @@ those integer keys is not present in the first level of the index (:issue:`33539 | |||
|
|||
left_df.merge(right_df, on=['animal', 'max_speed'], how="right") | |||
|
|||
.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
where did this go?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -336,68 +340,6 @@ Other enhancements | |||
Backwards incompatible API changes | |||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |||
|
|||
``MultiIndex.get_indexer`` interprets `method` argument differently |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
where did this go?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather not move this, this example is very needed to understand what the heck that change was.
I have no problem with you moving things around, but let's leave the examples. If you want to remove them, then let's discuss individually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be nice to get this in before more merge conflicts come up.
@@ -524,39 +466,6 @@ those integer keys is not present in the first level of the index (:issue:`33539 | |||
|
|||
left_df.merge(right_df, on=['animal', 'max_speed'], how="right") | |||
|
|||
.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -623,57 +532,14 @@ The method :meth:`core.DataFrameGroupBy.size` would previously ignore ``as_index | |||
|
|||
df.groupby("a", as_index=False).size() | |||
|
|||
.. _whatsnew_110.api_breaking.apply_applymap_first_once: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also cc @jorisvandenbossche for confirmation that this all look like bug fixes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see my comments. let's move things around, leaving the examples. and potentially change / remove them later (as to be honest I am not sure why you are deleting them in the first place).
@@ -336,68 +340,6 @@ Other enhancements | |||
Backwards incompatible API changes | |||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |||
|
|||
``MultiIndex.get_indexer`` interprets `method` argument differently |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather not move this, this example is very needed to understand what the heck that change was.
I have no problem with you moving things around, but let's leave the examples. If you want to remove them, then let's discuss individually.
I need to close this for a while. |
As discussed in #34801, this moves some items from our "API breaking changes" section to either bug fixes or enhancements. I've only moved the ones we can hopefully get consensus on as bug fix / enhancement. But let me know if any of these need further discussion on whether they're an API breaking change.