Skip to content

Test for proving Loading rule is not thread safe #2535

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

iosetek
Copy link

@iosetek iosetek commented Mar 15, 2021

When multiple threads are trying to load rule at the same
time even when they refer to different rule set a string
representing rule is malformed. It's believed that
this is caused by seclang-parser which contains plenty
of global variables.

To run the test simply enter 'test' directory and run
"./unit_tests"

When multiple threads are trying to load rule at the same
time even when they refer to different rule set a string
representing rule is malformed. It's believed that
this is caused by seclang-parser which contains plenty
of global variables.

To run the test simply enter 'test' directory and run
"./unit_tests"
@zimmerle
Copy link
Contributor

I think this pull request was built to illustrate #2536. Please follow the discussion on #2536.

@zimmerle zimmerle closed this Mar 15, 2021
@zimmerle zimmerle self-assigned this Mar 15, 2021
Copy link

@JohannesAarsnes JohannesAarsnes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need help to catch the IP of user who hax files.. also how to change adminrights(script?) to prevent users to hijack account?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants