Version issue #480
Version issue #480
Conversation
|
@amoghjalan can you please see if this works and suggest changes |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new field, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web-server/pages/api/internal/version.ts(2 hunks)web-server/src/layouts/ExtendedSidebarLayout/Sidebar/index.tsx(3 hunks)web-server/src/types/resources.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
web-server/src/layouts/ExtendedSidebarLayout/Sidebar/index.tsx (1)
cli/source/store/index.ts (1)
useSelector(28-28)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
web-server/src/types/resources.ts (1)
1023-1023: Type definition added correctly.The new field
current_docker_image_build_dateof typeDateStringhas been appropriately added to theImageStatusApiResponsetype. This aligns with the PR objective to expose Docker version information in the UI.web-server/pages/api/internal/version.ts (2)
26-26: Type definition extended correctly.Adding the
current_docker_image_build_datefield to theCheckNewVersionResponsetype properly supports the new feature requirement.
146-147: API response properly updated to include Docker build date.The response now includes both the latest remote Docker image build date and the current local Docker image build date, which properly addresses the PR objective.
web-server/src/layouts/ExtendedSidebarLayout/Sidebar/index.tsx (3)
10-10: Import added to support date formatting.The
formatfunction from date-fns is appropriately imported to format the build date for display.
13-17: Required component and hook imports added.All necessary components and hooks are correctly imported to support the new UI functionality.
89-93: Build date UI element added correctly.The build date is now prominently displayed at the bottom of the sidebar using appropriate components for layout and styling.
| const imageStatus = useSelector((s) => s.app.latestImageStatus); | ||
|
|
||
| const formattedDate = format( | ||
| new Date(imageStatus.current_docker_image_build_date), | ||
| 'dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss' | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for potential missing date.
The current implementation assumes that imageStatus.current_docker_image_build_date will always be available, which might cause runtime errors if the API data is still loading or if there's an error.
Consider adding a fallback or conditional check:
- const formattedDate = format(
- new Date(imageStatus.current_docker_image_build_date),
- 'dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss'
- );
+ const formattedDate = imageStatus?.current_docker_image_build_date
+ ? format(new Date(imageStatus.current_docker_image_build_date), 'dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss')
+ : 'Unknown build date';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const imageStatus = useSelector((s) => s.app.latestImageStatus); | |
| const formattedDate = format( | |
| new Date(imageStatus.current_docker_image_build_date), | |
| 'dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss' | |
| ); | |
| const imageStatus = useSelector((s) => s.app.latestImageStatus); | |
| const formattedDate = imageStatus?.current_docker_image_build_date | |
| ? format(new Date(imageStatus.current_docker_image_build_date), 'dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss') | |
| : 'Unknown build date'; |
Linked Issue(s)
closes #478
Acceptance Criteria fulfillment
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
Further comments
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements