Skip to content

License question #136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
geota opened this issue Dec 18, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

License question #136

geota opened this issue Dec 18, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@geota
Copy link

geota commented Dec 18, 2014

Do I need to abide by both licenses? Or can I pick which one to abide by?

Thanks!

@fge
Copy link
Collaborator

fge commented Dec 19, 2014

Basically, this is "pick your poison" or "drink it all".

While I don't make it clear in the license file, this basically means that should you choose to redistribute, you can pick either, or continue to dual license.

May I know the motivation behind your question? Do you have specific concerns with one license in particular?

@geota
Copy link
Author

geota commented Dec 19, 2014

Work for a company where the LGPL license is prohibitive for us particularly around its distribute source clause.

Thanks!

@geota geota closed this as completed Dec 19, 2014
huggsboson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2020
I pulled the additional text directly from #136 where @fge answered the question, "Do I need to abide by both licenses? Or can I pick which one to abide by?"

Adding it here in the LICENSE file to help avoid a need for anyone else to dive into closed issues to find the answer.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants