Skip to content

Resolved invalid example app browse to list in README #961

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2021
Merged

Conversation

sliverc
Copy link
Member

@sliverc sliverc commented Jul 18, 2021

Description of the Change

A blank is needed for a list to be properly represented in RST

Checklist

  • PR only contains one change (considered splitting up PR)
  • unit-test added
  • documentation updated
  • CHANGELOG.md updated (only for user relevant changes)
  • author name in AUTHORS

@sliverc sliverc requested a review from n2ygk July 18, 2021 19:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #961 (b8ddf07) into master (ca627a9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #961   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.82%   96.82%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        3904     3904           
=======================================
  Hits         3780     3780           
  Misses        124      124           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ca627a9...b8ddf07. Read the comment docs.

@n2ygk n2ygk merged commit 4c62f1d into master Jul 26, 2021
@n2ygk n2ygk deleted the browse-to-list branch July 26, 2021 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants