Skip to content

Add code quality analysis #895

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2021
Merged

Add code quality analysis #895

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2021

Conversation

sliverc
Copy link
Member

@sliverc sliverc commented Mar 10, 2021

Description of the Change

Adding this for a test run whether it gives any helpful information. If not we can also remove it again.

Checklist

  • PR only contains one change (considered splitting up PR)
  • unit-test added
  • documentation updated
  • CHANGELOG.md updated (only for user relevant changes)
  • author name in AUTHORS

Adding this for a test run whether it gives any helpful information. If not we can also remove it again.
@sliverc sliverc requested a review from n2ygk March 10, 2021 18:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #895 (2059de0) into master (3224db1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #895   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.70%   97.70%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        3182     3182           
=======================================
  Hits         3109     3109           
  Misses         73       73           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3224db1...2059de0. Read the comment docs.

@n2ygk n2ygk merged commit 1444a67 into master Mar 10, 2021
@n2ygk n2ygk deleted the codeql-analysis branch March 10, 2021 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants