-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 814
[CI:DOCS] Add CNCF roadmap, touchup other CNCF files #6124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[CI:DOCS] Add CNCF roadmap, touchup other CNCF files #6124
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: TomSweeneyRedHat The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
f2de84b
to
b3c617b
Compare
LGTM |
The update to MAINTAINERS.md isn't currently reflected in OWNERS. |
b3c617b
to
3a9b96e
Compare
3a9b96e
to
fbf2d20
Compare
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
GOVERNANCE.md
Outdated
|
||
The definitive source of truth for maintainers of this repository is the local [MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md) file. The [MAINTAINERS.md](https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md) file in the main Podman repository is used for project-spanning roles, including Core Maintainer and Community Manager. Some repositories in the project will also have a local [OWNERS](./OWNERS) file, which the CI system uses to map users to roles. Any changes to the [OWNERS](./OWNERS) file must make a corresponding change to the [MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md) file to ensure that the file remains up to date. Most changes to [MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md) will require a change to the repository’s [OWNERS](.OWNERS) file (e.g., adding a Reviewer), but some will not (e.g., promoting a Maintainer to a Core Maintainer, which comes with no additional CI-related privileges). | ||
|
||
Any Core Maintainers listed in Podman’s [MAINTAINERS.md](https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md) file should also be added to the list of “approvers” in the local [OWNERS](./OWNERS) file and to the list of “Maintainers” in the local [MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md) file. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to add Core Maintainers as Maintainers. Either list them as Core Maintainers or not at all, and say the definitive list exists in the Podman repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll try an new wording. We need to add them to the OWNERS file so the CI will be happy with them. I'd like to have a corresponding entry in the Maintainers file, but do think they should be listed as a Core-Maintainer. I'll spell that out a bit more. FWIW, that's what the file has now under the list of "Maintainers", both Maintainers and Core Maintainers in that list.
Making @flouthoc a maintainer LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got an incorrect github user name in there.
fbf2d20
to
2a72c27
Compare
OWNERS
Outdated
@@ -11,6 +13,7 @@ approvers: | |||
reviewers: | |||
- ashley-cui | |||
- baude | |||
- rhatdan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The tools don't care, but if we're keeping this list alphabetically sorted, this needs to be tweaked. Not a blocker either way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And DOH! When I went to alphabetize it, I realized rhatdan
has been there since the get go. A forest through the trees I guess. Update inc.
Added a ROADMAP.md file per CNCF requirements. Updated the GOVERNANCE.md file to point to and use the local MAINTAINERS.md file instead of the one in Podman. Also added links to the OWNERS file. Updated the MAINTAINERS.md file to bump Aditya Rajan to a Maintainer from a reviewer. Having him as a reviewer was a cut/paste error that was not caught when the file was first generated from the Podman file. Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <[email protected]>
2a72c27
to
4b9e2bd
Compare
Added a ROADMAP.md file per CNCF requirements.
Updated the GOVERNANCE.md file to point to and use the local MAINTAINERS.md file instead of the one in Podman. Also added links to the OWNERS file.
Updated the MAINTAINERS.md file to bump Aditya Rajan to a Maintainer from a reviewer. Having him as a reviewer was a cut/paste error that was not caught when the file was first generated from the Podman file.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
How to verify it
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?