chore(deps): update debian docker tag to v11

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
debian	final	major	10 -> 11

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box.

---

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3999 (e5bfa96) into main (30dc47d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head e5bfa96 differs from pull request most recent head 234b8ad. Consider uploading reports for the commit 234b8ad to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3999   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.51%   63.51%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1872     1872           
  Branches      379      379           
=======================================
  Hits         1189     1189           
  Misses        580      580           
  Partials      103      103           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 30dc47d...234b8ad. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

✨ Coder.com for PR #3999 deployed! It will be updated on every commit.

• Host: https://codercom-2mxw222br-codercom.vercel.app/docs/code-server
• Last deploy status: success
• Commit: 234b8ad
• Workflow status: https://github.com/cdr/code-server/actions/runs/1137802742

[jsjoeio]

I'm not sure if there are any reasons why we shouldn't do this.

cc @code-asher - is this okay to approve and merge?

[jawnsy]

I don't know what this image is used for, but if it's used to build our release binaries, then it might affect our minimum glibc version requirement (the same reason that Akash pinned things to ubuntu-16.04), which in turn affects the OSes that the release binaries can be used on. I don't have any specific recommendations here though. I don't know the minimum compatibility we need

[jsjoeio]

I don't know what this image is used for, but if it's used to build our release binaries, then it might affect our minimum glibc version requirement (the same reason that Akash pinned things to ubuntu-16.04

Ahhh okay. Good to know! I'll see what @code-asher thinks then.

I don't know the minimum compatibility we need

Maybe that's something we need to define

[code-asher]

We should be safe to update this; this is the end-user `codercom/code-server` image we push to Docker Hub and it's not used in the build process. For this image we just copy in the .deb built by the other containers (Centos 7 and Ubuntu 16.04 for AMD and ARM respectively).

[jsjoeio]

Cool! Thanks for confirming! I'm going to merge