Skip to content

CI: move arm64 build to allow_failures for now #36601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jreback opened this issue Sep 24, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #36514
Closed

CI: move arm64 build to allow_failures for now #36601

jreback opened this issue Sep 24, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #36514
Labels
CI Continuous Integration
Milestone

Comments

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Sep 24, 2020

https://travis-ci.org/github/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/729859284

well at least we detected this early. ideally can investigate and fix, but for now need a green CI.

@jreback jreback added the CI Continuous Integration label Sep 24, 2020
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.2 milestone Sep 24, 2020
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Sep 24, 2020

cc @pandas-dev/pandas-core

@bashtage
Copy link
Contributor

I've seen similar issues in other projects when test detection takes too long, especially on a lower single-threaded performance ARM cpu. Detection doesn't output anything. It would be nice if there was a way to have a small progress par during detection. I've also noticed that the output updating on non-AMD64 machines is "lumpy" as if it has a large buffer. This can also lead to failures since the runner doesn't know there has been any output even though something (but not enough) is sitting in the buffer.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Sep 24, 2020

sure - what is troubling is that this was working a few days ago with the same configuration

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants