-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
Docs: Suggestions for Idempotency #1572
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thanks for opening your first issue here! We'll come back to you as soon as we can. |
Hi @brnkrygs thank you for taking the time to go through the project and write down all the notes. As we discussed earlier internally, I have already started working on some of the fixes and will continue doing so. I'll open a PR soon! |
|
All the issues described except the dead URL to the main docs should have been fixed. We'll add the docs in one of the next PRs. |
This is now released under v1.11.1 version! |
What were you searching in the docs?
I was working on setting up an environment to beta test the new idempotency package - specifically trying to understand how to implement the function wrapper. Feedback has been shared through other channels, but felt it appropriate to capture here as well.
Is this related to an existing documentation section?
https://docs.powertools.aws.dev/lambda/typescript/latest/api/modules/_aws_lambda_powertools_idempotency.html#function-wrapper
How can we improve?
Got a suggestion in mind?
dataKeywordArgument
does, including fallback behavior if there isn’t a match, and how it does or does not interact witheventKeyJmesPath
Acknowledgment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: